LONDON – As the regulation of shadow banking moves closer, financial firms outside the traditional banking sector are increasingly concerned to demonstrate that they should not be seen as part of the still-ill-defined group bearing the “shadow bank” label. In early March, the London-based Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA), which represents many of the world’s hedge funds, produced a paper* arguing that credit hedge funds should definitely not be considered part of the shadow banking sector. The paper highlights crucial differences between the key functions of a traditional bank and those of credit hedge funds. Credit hedge funds, it says, do not take deposits, do not offer daily liquidity nor otherwise hold themselves out as guaranteeing the return of the invested principal. They manage their liquidity profiles by agreeing investor redemption terms which correspond to the liquidity profile of the underlying investments. They therefore do not engage in significant maturity transformation.

Global Risk Regulator’s articles are exclusively

available to full subscribers

 

Subscribe today to ensure you stay informed about the latest global regulations and standards.

Tel: +44 (0)20 7873 3183
Email: grr@ft.com

Global Risk Regulator
   
Subscribing to Global Risk Regulator ensures easy online access and navigation for the latest analysis, multimedia content, monthly and breaking news alerts straight to your inbox and access to the 10-year archive.
 
Navigate through the regulatory landscape with a subscription to Global Risk Regulator.