Newsletter Jul/Aug 2006: Solvency II valuation approach challenged

https://www.globalriskregulator.com/

Sorry, you appear to have JavaScript disabled. Please enable
JavaScript to use this tool.

Find out how to enable it for your browser:

Internet Explorer 7 or 8

Click the Tools menu.
Select Internet Options.
Click the Security tab.
Click the Custom Level button.
Scroll down until you see the 'Scripting' section. Select the 'Enable' radio button for 'Active Scripting'.
Click the OK button.
Click the Yes button in the confirmation window.
Refresh this page.

Firefox 3.0

Click the Tools menu.
Select Options.
Click the Contents tab.
Select the 'Enable JavaScript' checkbox.
Click the OK button.
Refresh this page.

Refresh

Regions / Europe

Staff | February 22, 2007

Insurance products with a high volatility of technical provisions and high run-off margin – most liability products, for instance – may increase in price or have to be redesigned if regulators require market-consistent valuation of reserves, according to a Solvency II study by the world’s largest reinsurance group*.

Global Risk Regulator’s articles are exclusively

available to full subscribers

Subscribe today to ensure you stay informed about the latest global regulations and standards. Tel: +44 (0)20 7873 3183 Email: grr@ft.com

Subscribing to Global Risk Regulator ensures easy online access and navigation for the latest analysis, multimedia content, monthly and breaking news alerts straight to your inbox and access to the 10-year archive.

Navigate through the regulatory landscape with a subscription to Global Risk Regulator.

Global Risk Regulator and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the FT Editorial Code of Practice.
© The Financial Times Limited 2026. All rights reserved. "FT" and "Financial Times" are trade and service marks of The Financial Times Limited. No part of these web pages may be reproduced or transmitted to or stored in any other website or any other form of electronic retrieval system, without prior permission.

Return of geopolitics
Headaches for global banks

EMIR REFIT
Potential to trigger unintended consequences

Newsletter Jul/Aug 2006: Solvency II valuation approach challenged

Global Risk Regulator’s articles are exclusively

available to full subscribers

Subscribe today to ensure you stay informed about the latest global regulations and standards.

Return of geopolitics Headaches for global banks

EMIR REFIT Potential to trigger unintended consequences

Newsletter Jul/Aug 2006: Solvency II valuation approach challenged

Global Risk Regulator’s articles are exclusively

available to full subscribers

Subscribe today to ensure you stay informed about the latest global regulations and standards.

Sign in

Return of geopolitics
Headaches for global banks

EMIR REFIT
Potential to trigger unintended consequences